5th Nov 2022
Steve has sent me an email that is more a statement than a question and I have put it in its entirety for discussion, now that all my readers have access to put up comments here at my Blog.
Would love to have your perspective, in accordance with the rules of the Blog, namely respect for the aims of my Site.
Interestingly enough, I have been sitting on a Blog from more than ten years ago that I never felt was the right time to publish.
It fits in with what Steve is mentioning and hopefully will bring about more discussion on this, and related topics.
Steve’s Letter In Full:
Society seems to be pulling itself apart regarding attitudes towards sex.
On one side we have the metoo movement with women complaining about sexual harassment, sexual abuse and exploitation, notably the Brittany Higgins court case (Australia).
Then scroll down the news page, there are all these articles sexualising women, with wardrobe malfunctions and Kardashian pics sexualising body image.
Then there is all these other articles about how young 10 year old girls are being forced through peer based social media to be so focused on body image, that when they feel they can’t make this image, suicide is considered.
What seems to be lacking here is an understanding of the link between the two. People follow the norm that is established, with sexualised imagery and encouragement of sexual expression, that then leads to tragedy.
It would seem to me that the metoo movement should be about trying to bring in moral codes about respect. Instead we have people going against the grain, those influencers who seem to be trying to lower moral codes in order to be popular/generate money/who knows why Influencers exist.
You have feminists talking about women’s rights and freedoms, but then their freedom becomes “do anything you want if it makes you happy”, which then becomes a negative influence as standards no longer apply, morals become a barrier that need to be overcome.
Society morals seem to become a free-for-all with the more freedom people have. Once moral standards are lost, such as with legalising of weed, that can lead to Ice, then people lose their freedom, with the rise of the underworld, organised crime, drug induced violence and theft, people become prisoners to these drug habits. Freedom is lost, not found.
In seeking freedom, moral standards are lost and respect for others disappears, causing personal freedoms to be lost.
It seems that if rules are put into place to protect morals, such as hijabs, that these seem to have a negative effect of not protecting women, or not supporting morals, but rather that the rules become a form of suppression and oppression.
I realise much of this is generalisations, but I’m interested in the SF’s take on the apparent double standards associated with Freedom, and society working against itself with metoo urging respect and dignity versus Influencers, social and general media actively promoting a lack of personal dignity and respect, all competing to see who can be the most immodest.
Another case in point is the US Gun laws. Freedom to have a gun is seen as a good thing, but there seems to be no comprehension that the Freedom to live safely and without fear is lost. Steve
Spirit Friends: This is very much a matter for individual thinking rather than Our perspective, hence why we suggested to Pete that he use it for an open forum of discussion.
Our only comment is to say that everything, repeat everything, that has been established in the Pisces era, from the time of Jesus to the current time, will come under extreme scrutiny by you all, up to and inclusive of the middle of the Aquarian Age. ‘The times, are definitely changing.’
Pete: This is the old Blog I alluded to earlier.
WOMEN VERSUS MEN April 2009
Currently we have a war happening between women and men. Superiority versus inferiority. Male versus female.
Men are portrayed as violence while women are portrayed as nurturers and emotional carers.
But if we were living in a world where reincarnation were the accepted norm, would that war have even started?
Do men reincarnate only as men?
Do women only reincarnate as women?
After WWII my Spirit Friends told me that the majority of men, killed in their prime in that war, reincarnated as a part of the latter Baby Boomers and mostly born from the late 50’s to early 60’s.
Not all came back as men, hence why the very strong ‘feminist’ movement of the time that followed.
My Spirit Friends have also said that as the world moves into the new Aquarian Age, there will be more gay and lesbian men and women, with a society far more tolerant of same.
At the same time, less children will be born and more people will be suicidally inclined.
All of this to slow down the world population, as the world becomes more inhospitable to life generally.
As we concentrate more on the evolution of souls from life to life, as in reincarnation, and as opposed to a one off average life of a 70 to 90 year period, won’t we be less hell bent on making sexual superiority an importance to our future society?
LINKS TO SPECIFIC BLOGS:
NEW PAGES:
PREVIOUS PAGES
Other Links Of Interest:
My email address: petesyc@gmail.com
Eric Leigh Pink: https://worldwidepredictions.com/Allie Dreams Down Under: https://www.youtube.com/c/EllieDreamsDownUnder
On The Light Path, The Road Forward 
Always enjoy reading your blogs.
Does the spirit world ever show our ancient past? My belief has always been the secrets to our past our deep in the ocean and under many feet of snow at the poles. One day we will find the relics of ancient man (my opinion) but my fear is we will have NO clue what the information they left for us would say.
Do spirits ever get into that?
Also, you and Eric have some predictions starting to converge that are forming a bigger picture.
Particularly your warning about an illness ripping through kids like sitting ducks. RSV is spreading like wildfire in the states.
LikeLike
Hi Mike. Thank you for your kind comments and regular view of my Blogs.
In a very brief reply to your question, Creation/God knows all. All things are part of Creation, both on the ‘living’ and ‘Spirit’ sides. So yes if such information exists, then it is known to that ‘Storage’ or ‘Library’. Some call it the Akashic Records.
We, here in the physical world, are entitled to whatever information will assist us in our expansion and growth of the Creator. However, most of us yearn for more trivial information, and from a physical/survival perspective, where as the information we need to ask for is most likely to be given to us in our quest to expand Creation.
Now this is a rather deep answer, but believe me, even if I were to write fifty or more Blogs on the subject, it would still be extremely difficult to absorb.
A starting point is best at the Split Soul Theory Blogs, where exists the explanation of how, who and what we all are in relation to Creation. But fair warning, it a deep read.
As to ‘the bigger picture’ re Eric and my materials. Yes, and again that is because it is coming from the same Source that I’ve mentioned above, as all good psychic information emanates from.
Where Eric and I differ, is not the accuracy of what we receive, or the quality or Source we receive, but how to best get people to change the events that could well destroy us all.
Eric promotes social media, word of mouth and other similar means of informing the masses. I also support that process, but the stronger way is by giving our Spirit Friends, and therefore Creation, the affirmation that the Will of Creation be done, not our own.
We do this with daily meditations and creating a Oneness with our own Spiritual Team: They are our connection to Creation.
Hope this isn’t too deep. And feel free to ask more questions if it helps.
Pete
LikeLike
Hi Pete,
Both yourself and Eric have said that people will live a lot longer after the next 100 years. Why would anyone want to do that? Every few weeks I walk down the road, I see evidence of another 1000+ year old tree cut down. It saddens me that people do not see the damage that they are doing, the habitats for bird life, insects, ecosystems all gone in the wink of an eye. Selfishness, stupidity and ignorance seems to be ruling the day.
We look on the news, another terrible drought and famine in Africa. Western society shakes its head as it sits in front of their TV gorging themselves with their 3 course dinners. More species now extinct. More atrocities uncovered in Ukraine. China’s military expanding more and more, Chinese ethnic minorities being ethnically cleansed. Global famine arising soon. And what looks like multiple nuclear detonations in the future. Being on this earth for 10, 20, 30 years is way too much already.
What has happened to this world? We’re like pre-schoolers who can’t even understand the basics, of harmony and communion.
Humanity is the disease of this world, desecrating what must have been one pure paradise. The extinction of humanity would bring back so much balance to this world, allow nature to thrive again.
Please ask your SFs if the next medical advancement could be to limit the lifetime of humans to just be 10 years rather that 100 years. How on earth does the Creation force think that allowing us to live longer is a good thing?
LikeLike
Hi Steve. My best suggestion for you is to read Blogs 33 to 35, The Bridge series as a starter.
EDIT: However, Blogs 71 through to 74 are more appropriate to your post.
As an exercise for now, imagine you have come to me a psychic medium asking for a glimpse of the future in the year 1822. That would have been 200 year ago.
No doubt I would have told you of the many wars prior to, and then including, the Great and Second World Wars. Vietnam, Korea, Middle East, rise of Communism etc. Of plagues and diseases, floods, droughts, fires, famine. Then the marvels of transport, including going to the moon, flying machines, travelling under water etc.
The predictions my Spirit Friends have been giving me to a future times of more that 100 years are no less spooky than those times past.
Its a case of perspective and what we do now so as to survive what is to come in any future life we may have then. Pete
LikeLike
Thanks for this information and detailed response!That is a perspective I never looked at it from. That being we are given info to push us forward as necessary. Cool stuff!
LikeLike
My pleasure Mike. Pete
LikeLike
Hi Steve, Pete and Spirit,
I’m a bit late on the discussion!
Just some of my observations and opinions –
Polarisation seems to be the way with most things in society these days, and I’m sure it has something to do with the changing of ages pushing ever harder against each other. I don’t think society has kept up with the consequences of its own advancements, and the reactions are probably also the effect of society trying to balance that out or somehow voice their discomfort, even if it is misdirected, naive or even vindictive. And I do believe a profit driven and individualistic society is a large reason for this neglect.
For example, the rapid development of social media means that many of its consequences haven’t been appropriately handled, such as its impact on mental health or even politics. I have known many people who have struggled with their body image because of how media affects them. And even if they acknowledge it to be unreasonable, for most it seems quite deep rooted.
I would say “Influencers” are functionally similar to certain newspapers/tabloids, with much more capability to do things to entertain, pander or offer opinions and sell their products to an audience, irrespective of whether their opinions are self contradictory or not. The title is a bit odd given that I think traditionally news channels/articles/tabloids have always been the “influencers” of their time.
Another example – possibly poor education and a lack of parenting (possibly caused by a focus for families to make ends meet) means that people may have and are able to look elsewhere to find things they value, with the black hole of the internet and social media being the obvious source of information to fill that void. Not to say these tools are bad, I just don’t know if we’re properly prepared for them – they’re sort of like steroids for information.
I suppose a more obvious example might be the climate – whilst we have been inventing and operating machines and factories of convenience and profit, up till now, there has been very little regard for the consequences. Now, climate change is becoming more noticeably a tangible issue than ever before.
The idea of morals, at least to me, is quite subjective. I don’t think these people are necessarily seeing morals as a barrier to overcome, they probably do have their own values which simply don’t align with the current status quo, which could be perfectly reasonably, or worse, may have qualms with those morals because of how others have applied those standards to them or enforced them as absolute morals.
To be more relevant to the issue in the letter though, I believe the notion of “sexualisation” is very much society driven. The idea of a sexualised scenario under one frame of thought, (or even culture) simply may not apply to another. For example, there exists cultures where having women topless is the norm, but they simply would not be sexualised in that culture the same way we would sexualise the same topless women.
I think there are two groups: The one which holds traditional standards, and two, the one which is trying to redefine standards, and work out a system which makes sense for them and their lifestyle. Depending on the context, I don’t necessarily think either is wrong, but no matter the school of thought, individuals can still exploit both for their own selfish gain.
LikeLike
Hi Varakai. So good to see you being able to go directly to the Blog, and give us your valuable thoughts.
I won’t comment other than to say I encourage comments that are aimed at supporting Good Will and fair mindedness.
No comments so far have been outside of these boundaries, and for that reason I commend you all for your comments.
Thank you all. Pete
LikeLike